“Request for Investigation of the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic by the International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor may under ordinary circumstances be just another United Nations Cabal exercise in futility.”
During our most recent Tribunal, we made a study of the efficacy of Requests for Investigation by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) into the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic, as opposed to our own Tribunal of Conscience, the 2nd Nuremberg, or Criminal Prosecutions brought by effective and non-corrupt prosecutors and courts.
This still remains a question of priorities, because many good faith efforts are still being made to file Requests for Investigation by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) into the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic, such as the below links filed on December 6, 2021
by UK prosecutors.
1. Crimes Against Humanity: UK Group Files Criminal Complaint In International Criminal Court On December 6th, 2021, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court received a criminal complaint on behalf of the people alleging violations of the Nuremberg Code and crimes against humanity.
2. UK Team File Complaint of Crimes Against Humanity With The International Criminal Court
3. UK Team File Complaint of Crimes Against Humanity With The International Criminal Court
Here is the link to the Memo of our Tribunal of Conscience findings as to whether such Requests for Investigation by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) into the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic are effective and result in any action.
- Download MEMORANDUM – ICC PROCEDURAL RULES
- https://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/memorandum-icc-procedural-rules-.pdf
- https://exopolitics.blogs.com/international_criminal_co/2021/12/what-is-the-probability-of-the-icc-prosecutor-granting-the-tribunals-request-for-investigation-into-the-genocidal-technolo.html
NOTE: Our Tribunal Research Memo found that of the approximately 12,000+ Requests for Intervention that have been filed with the Prosecutor’s office of the International Criminal Court (ICC), only 14 have been granted, the majority in Africa [partially because the Prosecutor is a biased African citizen].
No Requests to Investigate the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic [including one preliminarily prepared by our Tribunal until we pulled out of a collaborative NGO effort because of this Research finding] have been granted to date, despite the catastrophic Public Health Genocide evidentiary allegations of such Requests.
Here is the actual Conclusion of the Tribunal’s Memorandum:
”What is the probability of the ICC Prosecutor granting the Tribunal’s Request for Investigation into the Genocidal Technologies Pandemic?
”There are various factors that might affect this outcome.
- ”According to the ICC website, the Office of the Prosecutor has to date received approximately 12,000 Requests to Investigate. Yet the ICC website itself shows only 14 Situations under Investigation, with 11 of the 14 being in Africa. SEE: https://www.icc- cpi.int/pages/situation.aspx Thus current Situations under Investigation by the Prosecution amount to 14/12,000 or .00116667 of the total Requests for Investigation received by the Prosecutor over time. This vanishingly low percentage of acceptance by the ICC Prosecutor of Requests for Investigation suggests that, unless an applicant is a State Party, a Request for Investigation by the ICC Prosecutor may under ordinary circumstances be just another United Nations Cabal exercise in futility.”
December 18, 2021
Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, CERT Public Health
Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice
DONATE TO: STOP THE PANDEMIC BY LAW & JAIL PANDEMIC PERPSTRIBUNAL
GO FUND ME LINK
https://gf.me/u/za7rs6
https://gf.me/u/za7rs6
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE ME TO YOUR BLOG.
YOU CAN SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AT http://WWW.NEWSINSIDEOUT.COM THANK YOU